Around the world, people have reacted
with horror to the vile atrocities in Mumbai.
For three days, our TV screens transmitted images of carnage and chaos as
the toll of murder victims climbed to upwards of 190 people, with many
hundreds more injured.
Despite the fact that Western citizens were caught up in the attacks, there
is nevertheless a sense that this was nothing to do with us - a horrible
event happening in a faraway place.
Among commentators, moreover, there has been no small amount of confusion.
Were these terrorists motivated by the grievance between Muslims and Hindus
over Kashmir, or was this a broader attack by Al Qaeda?
If British and American tourists were singled out over Iraq - which many
assume is the motive for such attacks - why were Indians targeted in the
Victoria railway station?
And why was an obscure outreach centre geared to Jews marked for slaughter?
Such perceptions and questions suggest that, even now, Western commentators
still don't grasp what the free world is facing. This was not merely a
distant horror.
We should pay the closest possible attention to what happened in Mumbai
because something on this scale could well happen here.
But because we don't understand what we are actually up against, we are not
doing nearly enough to prevent this - or something even worse - occurring;
and if it were to happen here, we would be unable to cope.
The Mumbai atrocities show very clearly what too many obdurately deny - that
a war is being waged against civilization.
It is both global and local. It is not 'our' fault; it has nothing to do
with Muslim poverty, oppression or discrimination.
The Islamic fundamentalist fanatics use specific grievances - Kashmir, Iraq,
Palestine, Chechnya - merely as recruiting sergeants for their worldwide
holy war against all 'unbelievers'.
The Mumbai attackers targeted British, American and Indian citizens simply
because they wanted to kill as many British, American and Indian
'unbelievers' as possible.
Where they found Muslims, they spared them.
They also singled out for slaughter the occupants of an outreach
organization geared to Jews with no Israeli or political agenda -
underscoring the point that at the core of the Islamists' hatred of Israel
festers their hatred of the Jews.
This was not, as is so often described, 'mindless violence'.
On the contrary, the terrorists precisely calibrated both their choice of
targets and the way in which they attacked them. This tells us many things.
India was chosen in order to further two aims. First was to foment greater
tension between India and Pakistan.
No less important was the wish to destroy the ever more vital strategic
alliance between India and the West in common defense against the Islamist
onslaught.
That was why British and American visitors in those two grand hotels were
singled out.
And that was why Mumbai itself was chosen - as the symbol of India's
burgeoning commerce and prosperity and its links with the West.
The manner of these attacks also carried a message.
Many hostages were taken, but no attempt was made to use them to demand
redress of any grievances. They were simply killed.
That made a statement that the terrorists' agenda is non-negotiable.
The attacks demonstrated, above all, the reach of the perpetrators and the
impotence of their designated victims.
Those who believe that Islamist terror can be halted by addressing
grievances around the world are profoundly mistaken.
With these atrocities, moreover, Islamist attacks have moved much closer to
war than conventional terrorism.
The Iranian-born foreign affairs specialist Amir Taheri has pointed out that
the Mumbai attacks embody the plan outlined by a senior Al Qaeda strategist
after the U.S. decided to fight back following 9/11 - a decision that the
Islamists had not expected.
This new strategy entails targeting countries with a substantial Muslim
presence for 'low-intensity warfare' comprising bombings, kidnappings, the
taking of hostages, the use of women and children as human shields,
beheadings and other attacks that make normal life impossible.
Such a simultaneous, multi-faceted onslaught quickly reduces a city and a
country to chaos. It can be repeated anywhere - and our cities must be among
the most vulnerable.
~Melanie Phillips
American Tthinker: Mumbai: A Message for America
Mumbai: Of course, it's America's fault
2 comments:
Well, hello. According to Cool Dad, we are now BBFFs. So, um, hi...
It's probably because somehow, CD knew that I, too, got up on water skis the first time I tried. (For the record, I did not lose my shorts.)
Anyway, now that I've been introduced to you and your blog, I'll try to stop by! Even if I'm totally jealous of your walking baby - my 14-month-old is anti-walking for now! :)
Hello!
Thanks for checking out my blog and please, stop by anytime :)
God Bless!
Post a Comment